Assessment
May 10, 2019
Over the last ten years, I’ve facilitated district-wide shifts to standards based grading numerous times. As I prepare to begin again in a new-to-me school district, the memories of those professional experiences aren’t the ones rising to the top of my consciousness, though.
I actually wrote a tiny bit about that on this blog, way back when. My daughter Nina was in fifth grade. She had an incredible teacher whose dedication to her own professional learning ensured that all of her students thrived as the district made the shift to standards based grading. As she facilitated our first parent conference of the year, she explained how her documentation and reporting system was changing. She also walked us through the new report card, and she showed us how the data she was capturing in class aligned with this dramatically different document.
I was impressed.
I was also a bit entertained when Nina realized that regardless of how well she was performing, her learning had no ceiling. In the absence of grades, we were all inspired to speak a bit more about skills and specifically, the ones that Nina would prioritize and work to improve upon. She wasn’t an “A” or “B” or “C” or “D” student any longer–she was a learner, just like everyone else. Our conversations were about her learning rather than her performance. The data that we explored together enabled this very different dialogue, too.
If I’m being honest, the shift was not a comfortable one for leaders, staff, students, or parents. Like every district that takes this dive, challenges were an inescapable part of the change. And this work happened years ago, ahead of the wave that so many more are riding far better now because so many people are navigating the water together. That kind of company matters.
And that’s why I’m writing this post.
There are many reasons why educators would make the shift to standards based grading, but before I go there, I have another parenting story to tell: When my daughters applied to colleges, we knew that while state schools could provide high quality experiences, private schools tended to offer more scholarship and grant monies that might make them a more attractive choice.
And they did. Without a doubt.
In fact, we learned very quickly that many schools offer significant grant monies to students who achieve a certain GPA. And by significant, I mean tens of thousands of dollars per year per student, depending on his or her performance. I wondered: If systems aren’t using standards based grading, are they making unintentional and unnecessary contributions to their students’ college debt issues?
Case in point: Many colleges and universities offer substantial grants to students who earn a high school GPA of 3.5 or better. I’m quite familiar with one university that offers all incoming freshman who have met this benchmark $15,000 per year. No letters of recommendation are required. A separate application is not requested. The monies are simply granted upon application. That’s $60,000 over a four year term.
I don’t know about you, but when I’m staring down those kinds of numbers, I’m wondering how on earth we can justify the fact that three different English 11 teachers might be using three wildly different sets of assessment measures and wildly different weighting scales to put an average together. When GPAs are the result of inconsistent and misaligned grading practices and those GPAs influence college grant monies to this degree, I’m struggling.
And here’s what’s worse: I’m also revealing my privilege. This little problem is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to equity issues. It’s the kind of problem that kids who are fortunate enough to consider college have the audacity to stress about.
We need to learn more and do better here.
Me, too.
Sure, report cards change, but I think we need to embrace standards based grading because it matters in ways that we haven’t even begun to explore with any real level of depth. Achievement matters, but equity is bigger than that. Are we discussing the relationship between the two often enough? I know that I”m not.
Standards based grading holds all of us accountable for using far more accurate measures of assessment as well. Without accuracy, we will never have equity. One of the things that is so troublesome about the use of grades and grade point averages right now is that they are often so incredibly dishonest. When we don’t attend to accuracy, we become purveyors of a false and often, cruel reality. I’m not thinking of the kids who struggle to be seen inside of traditional systems that still value what we always have–performance in the four core subjects. I’m thinking of the kids who shine inside of systems that fail to set and help them achieve truly high standards. These are the kids who don’t truly learn how to learn until they enter college or the world of work, and that education is often a very uncomfortable one. They are also the kids who unearth learning disabilities much later in life than they should because no one really challenged them to their fullest potential previously. When kids like these struggle inside of non-standards based systems, grade inflation, pity, and blame screen everyone from the truth, undermining the kind of problem seeking and solving that drives real learning and growth.
That’s what standards based grading does–it shifts our focus to from products and performance to learning. And kids aren’t the only learners inside of these systems. Teachers and administrators are as well. And rather than producing high volumes of sub-par work in order to be evaluated, learners revisit, rethink, revise, and resubmit just-right work of far greater quality in order to make a careful assessment of progress toward specific learning goals. This enables targeted instruction, feedback, and intervention.
When it comes to learning, all of those things matter more than grades.
Much more.
I feel comfortable leading the shift to standards based grading inside of different kinds of systems, but my experiences have taught me how complex this work is. While it’s fun to distinguish ourselves as experts on the consulting trail, it’s also pretty naive. This isn’t my first time at the rodeo, friends. I know that I need to learn as I go, and I know that some of that learning won’t be comfortable. I aim to come at it all with intention, and I’m hoping that some of you will keep me company along the way.
As I begin this initiative, these are my first steps:
And I’m still thinking and planning. Truly. More to come here, soon.
Matt Townsley was one of the first people to begin sharing his experiences and expertise with standards based learning long ago, and I continue to stand on the shoulders of giants like him and those that he turns to as well. Wander by his place if this topic interests you and you aren’t connected yet.
I plan to spend some time uploading my resources and making them available online as well. You’ll be able to download, print, use, adapt, and share them if you wish. So, I hope you’ll stay in touch with me, too. I’m here, on Twitter, and on Facebook, all. I’ll share some updates in those spaces whenever a new tool is posted.
I’ll keep blogging my thoughts and my work through the summer and into next year. Stick around. I hope we can talk about this more together. And share your concerns, questions, and challenges, too. I know that this isn’t a silver bullet. I know that there are many things to question. Please do.